Questions raised over rise in ‘ghost candidates’

Election candidates prioritise being seen as a lot as attainable to present themselves the very best likelihood of profitable however that is not the case for one Sydney voters, the place the One Nation contender is nowhere to be seen.

The seat of Hughes covers a part of the Sutherland shire and different suburbs within the metropolis’s south.

The One Nation candidate for the voters, Narelle Seymour, hasn’t been seen for the reason that begin of the election marketing campaign.

The One Nation candidate for the electorate, Narelle Seymour, hasn't allegedly not been seen since the start of the election campaign.
The One Nation candidate for the voters, Narelle Seymour, hasn’t allegedly not been seen for the reason that begin of the election marketing campaign. (9News)

“We haven’t seen hide nor hair of her, we have no idea who Narelle Seymour is,” unbiased candidate Linda Seymour mentioned.

It’s inflicting confusion for unbiased Seymour, who shares a surname with the One Nation candidate.

“Let’s be clear, she’s the other Seymour, I’m the real Seymour,” she mentioned.

The different Seymour could also be on the poll however she’s spent no time campaigning in her voters.

Another One Nation contender claimed Seymour isn’t a ghost however simply does not have the “momentum” in her voters.

“You can pinch her and she’ll hurt yeah she’s a real person, she just doesn’t have momentum,” the occasion’s candidate for Cook, Gaye Cameron, mentioned.

One Nation is being accused of using ghost candidates as part of its election campaign in Narelle Seymour electorate of Sydney.
One Nation is being accused of utilizing ghost candidates as a part of its election marketing campaign in Narelle Seymour voters of Sydney. (9News)

It has additionally been revealed Narelle Seymour does not dwell within the voters however quite in Wagga Wagga, 450 kilometres away.

These ghost candidates are showing in plenty of electorates and 9News understands a minimum of a dozen individuals working for the minor occasion dwell nowhere close to the voters they’re contesting.

“It’s happened before with other parties,” Cameron mentioned.

“The laws are there that you can put your name down.”

The Australian Electoral Commission mentioned there is not any authorized requirement for candidates to dwell within the voters they’re working in however most voters would fairly anticipate a neighborhood to signify them.

“It may be legal but it is seriously unethical,” Seymour mentioned.

There can also be hypothesis whether or not the candidates are in it for the taxpayer cash, as Australian National University political analyst Mark Kenny identified the contenders can nonetheless be eligible for election funding.

“If they get four per cent of the first preference vote, they are eligible for election funding,” Kenny mentioned.

Tanya Plibersek shared a throwback photo to Twitter to remind young Australians to enrol. The deadline to do so 8pm tonight.

Throwback images of federal politicians

“You get $10,000, no questions asked. It’s outrageous.”

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.